Repeatable reads for /sync

This commit is contained in:
Neil Alexander 2022-10-10 14:01:13 +01:00
parent 0f09e9d196
commit 0dfd3cd876
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: A02A2019A2BB0944

View file

@ -56,31 +56,23 @@ type Database struct {
} }
func (d *Database) NewDatabaseSnapshot(ctx context.Context) (*DatabaseTransaction, error) { func (d *Database) NewDatabaseSnapshot(ctx context.Context) (*DatabaseTransaction, error) {
return d.NewDatabaseTransaction(ctx) txn, err := d.DB.BeginTx(ctx, &sql.TxOptions{
// Set the isolation level so that we see a snapshot of the database.
/* // In PostgreSQL repeatable read transactions will see a snapshot taken
TODO: Repeatable read is probably the right thing to do here, // at the first query, and since the transaction is read-only it can't
but it seems to cause some problems with the invite tests, so // run into any serialisation errors.
need to investigate that further. // https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/transaction-iso.html#XACT-REPEATABLE-READ
Isolation: sql.LevelRepeatableRead,
txn, err := d.DB.BeginTx(ctx, &sql.TxOptions{ ReadOnly: true,
// Set the isolation level so that we see a snapshot of the database. })
// In PostgreSQL repeatable read transactions will see a snapshot taken if err != nil {
// at the first query, and since the transaction is read-only it can't return nil, err
// run into any serialisation errors. }
// https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/transaction-iso.html#XACT-REPEATABLE-READ return &DatabaseTransaction{
Isolation: sql.LevelRepeatableRead, Database: d,
ReadOnly: true, ctx: ctx,
}) txn: txn,
if err != nil { }, nil
return nil, err
}
return &DatabaseTransaction{
Database: d,
ctx: ctx,
txn: txn,
}, nil
*/
} }
func (d *Database) NewDatabaseTransaction(ctx context.Context) (*DatabaseTransaction, error) { func (d *Database) NewDatabaseTransaction(ctx context.Context) (*DatabaseTransaction, error) {