mirror of
https://github.com/matrix-org/dendrite.git
synced 2026-01-04 20:53:09 -06:00
Update 1_planning.md
Modes section of the planning component of the documentation rewritten for grammar and clarity.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6af35385ba
commit
15680df729
|
|
@ -9,21 +9,13 @@ permalink: /installation/planning
|
|||
|
||||
## Modes
|
||||
|
||||
Dendrite can be run in one of two configurations:
|
||||
Dendrite consists of several components, each responsible for a different aspect of the matrix protocol. Users can run Dendrite in one of two modes which dictate how these components are executed and communicate.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Monolith mode**: All components run in the same process. In this mode,
|
||||
it is possible to run an in-process NATS Server instead of running a standalone deployment.
|
||||
This will usually be the preferred model for low-to-mid volume deployments, providing the best
|
||||
balance between performance and resource usage.
|
||||
* **Monolith mode** runs all components in a single process. Components communicate through an internal NATS server with generally low overhead. This mode dramatically simplifies deployment complexity and offers the best balance between performance and resource usage for low-to-mid volume deployments.
|
||||
|
||||
* **Polylith mode**: A cluster of individual components running in their own processes, dealing
|
||||
with different aspects of the Matrix protocol. Components communicate with each other using
|
||||
internal HTTP APIs and NATS Server. This will almost certainly be the preferred model for very
|
||||
large deployments but scalability comes with a cost. API calls are expensive and therefore a
|
||||
polylith deployment may end up using disproportionately more resources for a smaller number of
|
||||
users compared to a monolith deployment.
|
||||
* **Polylith mode** runs all components in isolated processes. Components communicate through an external NATS server and HTTP APIs, which incur considerable overhead. While this mode allows for more granular control of resources dedicated toward individual processes, given the additional communications overhead, it is only necessary for very large deployments.
|
||||
|
||||
At present, we **recommend monolith mode deployments** in all cases.
|
||||
Given our current state of development, **we recommend monolith mode** for all deployments.
|
||||
|
||||
## Databases
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue