Updates from review comments

This commit is contained in:
Neil Alexander 2020-04-06 10:01:35 +01:00
parent b861cea87c
commit ae277980d1
3 changed files with 29 additions and 7 deletions

View file

@ -107,7 +107,6 @@ func getState(
return nil, &util.JSONResponse{Code: http.StatusNotFound, JSON: nil}
}
prevEventIDs := []string{eventID}
authEventIDs := getIDsFromEventRef(event.AuthEvents())
var response api.QueryStateAndAuthChainResponse
@ -115,7 +114,7 @@ func getState(
ctx,
&api.QueryStateAndAuthChainRequest{
RoomID: roomID,
PrevEventIDs: prevEventIDs,
PrevEventIDs: []string{eventID},
AuthEventIDs: authEventIDs,
},
&response,

View file

@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ type QueryStateAndAuthChainRequest struct {
// The list of auth events for the event. Used to calculate the auth chain
AuthEventIDs []string `json:"auth_event_ids"`
// Should state resolution be ran on the result events?
// TODO: check call sites and remove if we always want to do state res
ResolveState bool `json:"resolve_state"`
}

View file

@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ package state
import (
"context"
"errors"
"fmt"
"sort"
"time"
@ -694,14 +693,25 @@ func ResolveConflictsAdhoc(
) ([]gomatrixserverlib.Event, error) {
type stateKeyTuple struct {
Type string
StateKey *string
StateKey string
}
// Prepare our data structures.
eventMap := make(map[stateKeyTuple][]gomatrixserverlib.Event)
var conflicted, notConflicted, resolved []gomatrixserverlib.Event
// Run through all of the events that we were given and sort them
// into a map, sorted by (event_type, state_key) tuple. This means
// that we can easily spot events that are "conflicted", e.g.
// there are duplicate values for the same tuple key.
for _, event := range events {
tuple := stateKeyTuple{event.Type(), event.StateKey()}
if event.StateKey() == nil {
// Ignore events that are not state events.
continue
}
// Append the events if there is already a conflicted list for
// this tuple key, create it if not.
tuple := stateKeyTuple{event.Type(), *event.StateKey()}
if _, ok := eventMap[tuple]; ok {
eventMap[tuple] = append(eventMap[tuple], event)
} else {
@ -709,6 +719,10 @@ func ResolveConflictsAdhoc(
}
}
// Split out the events in the map into conflicted and unconflicted
// buckets. The conflicted events will be ran through state res,
// whereas unconfliced events will always going to appear in the
// final resolved state.
for _, list := range eventMap {
if len(list) > 1 {
conflicted = append(conflicted, list...)
@ -717,21 +731,29 @@ func ResolveConflictsAdhoc(
}
}
// Work out which state resolution algorithm we want to run for
// the room version.
stateResAlgo, err := version.StateResAlgorithm()
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
switch stateResAlgo {
case gomatrixserverlib.StateResV1:
// Currently state res v1 doesn't handle unconflicted events
// for us, like state res v2 does, so we will need to add the
// unconflicted events into the state ourselves.
// TODO: Fix state res v1 so this is handled for the caller.
resolved = gomatrixserverlib.ResolveStateConflicts(conflicted, authEvents)
resolved = append(resolved, notConflicted...)
case gomatrixserverlib.StateResV2:
// TODO: auth difference here?
resolved = gomatrixserverlib.ResolveStateConflictsV2(conflicted, notConflicted, authEvents, authEvents)
default:
return nil, errors.New("unsupported state resolution algorithm")
return nil, fmt.Errorf("unsupported state resolution algorithm %v", stateResAlgo)
}
// Return the final resolved state events, including both the
// resolved set of conflicted events, and the unconflicted events.
return resolved, nil
}
@ -749,7 +771,7 @@ func (v StateResolution) resolveConflicts(
case gomatrixserverlib.StateResV2:
return v.resolveConflictsV2(ctx, notConflicted, conflicted)
}
return nil, errors.New("unsupported state resolution algorithm")
return nil, fmt.Errorf("unsupported state resolution algorithm %v", stateResAlgo)
}
// resolveConflicts resolves a list of conflicted state entries. It takes two lists.