Placeholder comments for modifications needed to /send_join for power DAG
This commit is contained in:
parent
a3b87f477c
commit
549d20cb61
|
@ -312,6 +312,9 @@ func SendJoin(
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: (PowerDAG) query state & power DAG
|
||||
// We return the entire power DAG with a send_join response
|
||||
|
||||
// Fetch the state and auth chain. We do this before we send the events
|
||||
// on, in case this fails.
|
||||
var stateAndAuthChainResponse api.QueryStateAndAuthChainResponse
|
||||
|
@ -339,6 +342,9 @@ func SendJoin(
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: (Power DAG) will we have enough info in a join response to check membership?
|
||||
// We should include the user membership event (if there is one) in the state response.
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if the user is already in the room. If they're already in then
|
||||
// there isn't much point in sending another join event into the room.
|
||||
// Also check to see if they are banned: if they are then we reject them.
|
||||
|
@ -425,6 +431,8 @@ func SendJoin(
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: (PowerDAG) Adapt this to return the full power DAG & state + user membership event (if it exists)
|
||||
|
||||
// sort events deterministically by depth (lower is earlier)
|
||||
// We also do this because sytest's basic federation server isn't good at using the correct
|
||||
// state if these lists are randomised, resulting in flakey tests. :(
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue